2016-05-08 3 views
1

Ich bin der fractional Knapsack. Es funktioniert für die meisten Fälle, aber für einige Eckfälle fehlgeschlagen. Der Algorithmus, den ich implementiert habe, ist ein Standard. Ich mache etwas dumm in get_optimal_value(), konnte nicht herausfinden. Bitte helfen Sie!C# Fractional Rucksack o (n Logn) Lösung

using System; 
using System.Collections.Generic; 

namespace FractionalKnapsackcsharp 
{ 
    public class Program 
    { 
     public static void Main(string[] args) 
     { 
      int n; 
      int capacity; 
      string n1 = Console.ReadLine(); 
      n = Convert.ToInt32(n1.Split(' ')[0]); 
      capacity = Convert.ToInt32(n1.Split(' ')[1]); 

      //read the array values 
      string[] answer = new string[n]; 

      double[] values = new double[n]; 
      int[] weights = new int[n]; 
      for (int i = 0; i < answer.Length; i++) 
      { 
       answer[i] = Console.ReadLine(); 
       values[i] = Convert.ToDouble(answer[i].Split(' ')[0]); 
       weights[i] = Convert.ToInt32(answer[i].Split(' ')[1]); 
      } 

      double value = get_optimal_value(n, capacity, weights, values); 
      Console.WriteLine(Math.Round(value, 4)); 
     } 

     public static double get_optimal_value(int n, int capacity, int[] weights, double[] values) 
     { 
      double value = 0.0; 

      //There should be a better way to handle this scenario, any idea ? 
      if (n == 1) 
      { 
       int a = weights[0] < capacity ? weights[0] : capacity; 
       value = value + a * values[0]/weights[0]; 
       return value; 
      } 

      Array.Sort(weights, values, Comparer<int>.Create((x, y) => y.CompareTo(x))); 

      double[] A = new double[n]; 
      for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) 
      { 
       if (capacity == 0) return value; 

       int a = weights[i] < capacity ? weights[i] : capacity; 
       value = value + a * values[i]/weights[i]; 
       weights[i] = weights[i] - a; 
       A[i] = A[i] + a; 
       capacity = capacity - a; 
      } 
      return value; 
     } 
    } 
} 
+1

Sie die letzte nicht bei 1 für Schleife starten? –

+0

ja, das ist ein Teil des Problems. Aber das eigentliche große Problem ist, dass ich die Sortierung auf der Grundlage des Verhältnisses Wert/Gewicht verpasste und das Gewichtungsfeld entsprechend sortierte/anordnete, was es zum Scheitern brachte. Vielen Dank ! – Srini

Antwort

1

Das Problem ist mit der Sortierung, hier ist die Arbeitslösung:

using System; 
using System.Collections.Generic; 

namespace FractionalKnapsackcsharp 
{ 
    public class Program 
    { 
     public static void Main(string[] args) 
     { 
      int n = 0; 
      double capacity; 
      string n1 = Console.ReadLine(); 
      n = Convert.ToInt32(n1.Split(' ')[0]); 
      capacity = Convert.ToDouble(n1.Split(' ')[1]); 

      double[] values = new double[n]; 
      double[] weights = new double[n]; 
      for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) 
      { 
       var answer = Console.ReadLine(); 
       values[i] = Convert.ToDouble(answer.Split(' ')[0]); 
       weights[i] = Convert.ToDouble(answer.Split(' ')[1]); 
      } 

      double value = get_optimal_value(n, capacity, values, weights); 
      Console.WriteLine(Math.Round(value, 4)); 
     } 

     public static double get_optimal_value(int n, double capacity, double[] values, double[] weights) 
     { 
      double value = 0.0; 

      Array.Sort(values, weights, Comparer<double>.Create((x, y) => y.CompareTo(x))); 

      double[] ratio = new double[n]; 

      for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) 
      { 
       ratio[i] = values[i]/weights[i]; 
      } 

      Array.Sort(ratio, weights, Comparer<double>.Create((x, y) => y.CompareTo(x))); 
      //Array.Sort(ratio, weights, Comparer<double>.Create((x, y) => x.CompareTo(y))); 

      //double[] A = new double[n]; 
      for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) 
      { 
       if (capacity == 0) return value; 

       double a = weights[i] < capacity ? weights[i] : capacity; 
       //value = value + a * (values[i]/weights[i]); 
       value = value + a * ratio[i]; 
       weights[i] = weights[i] - a; 
       //A[i] = A[i] + a; 
       capacity = capacity - a; 
      } 
      return value; 
     } 
    } 
} 
Verwandte Themen