Manageiq nicht Zugriff auf Hawkular in Centos 7 VMWare

Question

Meine Entwicklungsumgebung ist CentOS 7 in VMware Workstation 11 und manageriq Docker Container (manageriq/manageIq: euwe-2) auf Eclipse Docker Perspektive. Die Managementapplikation (https://127.0.0.1:8443) wird gut ausgeführt. Aber Falken verbinden ist gescheitert. Unten ist mein hawkular Ausführungsbefehl

<HAWKULAR_HOME>./standalone.sh -Dhawkular.rest.user=jhwang –Dhawkular.rest.password=password -Dhawkular.agent.enabled=true -b 192.168.200.51 

In ManageIQ Webkonsole ich auf hawkular Hostnamen, sondern Verbindung failes in der IP-Adresse eingeben. Hier ist das Bild von ManageIQ:

Außerhalb von VMWare Workstation, das obige Verfahren gut funktioniert. ManageIQ stellt die Verbindung mit der Hawkular-IP-Adresse her. Aber in VMware, kein Zugriff. Ich fürchte, ich verwende eine falsche Hawkular-Adresse. Ich befestige die Ausgabe von ifconfig Befehl.

$ ifconfig 
docker0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 
     inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 
     inet6 fe80::42:8fff:fe28:6f2d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> 
     ether 02:42:8f:28:6f:2d txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) 
     RX packets 1283 bytes 342465 (334.4 KiB) 
     RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 
     TX packets 1344 bytes 157135 (153.4 KiB) 
     TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 

ens33: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 
     inet 192.168.200.51 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.200.255 
     inet6 fe80::c494:6514:b641:e046 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> 
     ether 00:0c:29:57:00:09 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) 
     RX packets 10875 bytes 7648436 (7.2 MiB) 
     RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 
     TX packets 7465 bytes 1019458 (995.5 KiB) 
     TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 
     inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 
     inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> 
     loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) 
     RX packets 48647 bytes 14786880 (14.1 MiB) 
     RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 
     TX packets 48647 bytes 14786880 (14.1 MiB) 
     TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 

vethcf88378: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 
     inet6 fe80::c000:d9ff:fe82:e915 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> 
     ether c2:00:d9:82:e9:15 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) 
     RX packets 1283 bytes 360427 (351.9 KiB) 
     RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 
     TX packets 1352 bytes 157783 (154.0 KiB) 
     TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 

virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 
     inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255 
     ether 52:54:00:ce:2f:27 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) 
     RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) 
     RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 
     TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) 
     TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 

Und diese sind Protokolle

[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546217 2017] [proxy_http:error] [pid 862] [client 172.17.0.1:58384] AH01114: HTTP: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0, referer: https://127.0.0.1:8443/ 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546274 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 862] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: HTTP: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:3008 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546280 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 862] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546281 2017] [proxy_http:error] [pid 862] [client 172.17.0.1:58384] AH01114: HTTP: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0, referer: https://127.0.0.1:8443/ 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546346 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 862] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: HTTP: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:3009 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546352 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 862] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:01.546353 2017] [proxy_http:error] [pid 862] [client 172.17.0.1:58384] AH01114: HTTP: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0, referer: https://127.0.0.1:8443/ 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.874238 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: WS: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:5001 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.875769 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.876936 2017] [proxy_wstunnel:error] [pid 864] [client 172.17.0.1:58492] AH02452: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877157 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: WS: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:5002 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877170 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877173 2017] [proxy_wstunnel:error] [pid 864] [client 172.17.0.1:58492] AH02452: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877542 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: WS: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:5003 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877552 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877554 2017] [proxy_wstunnel:error] [pid 864] [client 172.17.0.1:58492] AH02452: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877717 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: WS: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:5004 (0.0.0.0) failed 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877724 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (0.0.0.0) for 60s 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877726 2017] [proxy_wstunnel:error] [pid 864] [client 172.17.0.1:58492] AH02452: failed to make connection to backend: 0.0.0.0 
[Sun Apr 23 01:08:17.877799 2017] [proxy:error] [pid 864] (111)Connection refused: AH00957: WS: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:5005 (0.0.0.0) failed 

Answer 1

Diese Trennung zu "iptables that was blocking the loopback port" zurückzuführen ist. Also die eine Befehlszeile löste mein Problem.