2016-07-14 10 views
0

Wir verwenden Togglz, um die Funktionen in unserem Projekt ein- und auszuschalten. Die folgende TogglzFeature Enum setzt org.togglz.core.Feature SchnittstelleKomponententest für Ein- und Ausschalten der Funktion

public enum TogglzFeature implements Feature { 

    @EnabledByDefault 
    @Label("Current XSLT code") 
    FEATURE_XSLT, 

    @Label("NEW JAXB code") 
    FEATURE_JAXB; 

    public boolean isActive() { 
     FeatureManager manager = FeatureContext.getFeatureManager(); 
     return manager.isActive(this); 
    } 

} 

dann eine der Methoden im Test (zB mut_1(params)) prüft das Enum, so etwas wie

if(TogglzFeature.FEATURE_JAXB.isActive()) { dothings();} 

Beachten Sie, dass Merkmal togglz ist nicht in den Params von mut_1. Das mut_1 hebt es nur in der Laufzeit aus dem Kontext auf.

Also was ist der beste Weg, um die mut_1() wissen lassen, dass ich will TogglzFeature.FEATURE_JAXB.isActive() zurück True?

Ich habe versucht, dies mit Mockito/PowerMock

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class) 
@PrepareForTest({TogglzFeature.class}) 
public class myTestClass { 

    //private members and set up 

    @Test 
    public void testTogglz(){ 
     PowerMockito.mockStatic(TogglzFeature.class); 
     BDDMockito.given(TogglzFeature.FEATURE_JAXB.isActive()).willReturn(true); 

     //execution and verification 
    } 
} 

Und das System spuckt diese alle auf mich

java.lang.VerifyError: Inconsistent stackmap frames at branch target 128 
Exception Details: 
    Location: 
    com/lmig/ci/rate/togglz/TogglzFeature.values()[Lcom/lmig/ci/rate/togglz/TogglzFeature; @128: ldc 
    Reason: 
    Type 'java/lang/Object' (current frame, locals[1]) is not assignable to '[Lcom/lmig/ci/rate/togglz/TogglzFeature;' (stack map, locals[1]) 
    Current Frame: 
    bci: @120 
    flags: { } 
    locals: { top, 'java/lang/Object', null, null } 
    stack: { 'java/lang/Object', null } 
    Stackmap Frame: 
    bci: @128 
    flags: { } 
    locals: { top, '[Lcom/lmig/ci/rate/togglz/TogglzFeature;' } 
    stack: { } 
    Bytecode: 
    0x0000000: 1248 b800 4e12 4f03 bd00 5112 53b8 0057 
    0x0000010: 1259 b800 5f4b 2a01 4c01 4d2b 127e b800 
    0x0000020: 8012 8112 82b8 0085 b800 894e 2db2 0063 
    0x0000030: a600 0ab2 0063 4da7 0008 2dc0 008a 4d2c 
    0x0000040: a500 082a c000 64b0 014c 014d 2b12 8bb8 
    0x0000050: 0080 128c 128d b800 85b8 0089 4e2d b200 
    0x0000060: 63a6 000a b200 014d a700 082d c000 644d 
    0x0000070: 2c4c 014d 014e 2b01 a500 082b 4ea7 0009 
    0x0000080: 128f b800 804e 2d12 9003 bd00 5112 91b8 
    0x0000090: 0093 1295 b800 963a 0419 04b2 0063 a600 
    0x00000a0: 0b2b b600 984d a700 0919 04c0 008a 4d2c 
    0x00000b0: c000 03b0        
    Stackmap Table: 
    full_frame(@58,{Object[#81],Top,Top,Object[#81]},{Object[#81]}) 
    full_frame(@63,{Object[#81],Top,Object[#81]},{Object[#81]}) 
    chop_frame(@72,3) 
    full_frame(@107,{Top,Top,Top,Object[#81]},{}) 
    full_frame(@112,{Top,Top,Object[#81]},{}) 
    full_frame(@128,{Top,Object[#50]},{}) 
    append_frame(@134,Top,Object[#81]) 
    full_frame(@169,{Top,Top,Top,Top,Object[#81]},{}) 
    full_frame(@175,{Top,Top,Object[#81]},{}) 

    at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0(Native Method) 
    at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2671) 
    at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2020) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.repackaged.ClassImposterizer.setConstructorsAccessible(ClassImposterizer.java:86) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.repackaged.ClassImposterizer.imposterise(ClassImposterizer.java:72) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.MockCreator.createMethodInvocationControl(MockCreator.java:122) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.MockCreator.createMock(MockCreator.java:70) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.MockCreator.mock(MockCreator.java:47) 
    at org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.mockStatic(PowerMockito.java:71) 
    at com.lmig.ci.rate.orchestration.OrchestratorTest.workerCompShouldGoThroughSteppedAudit(OrchestratorTest.java:97) 
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) 
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) 
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) 
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:316) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:300) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:288) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:208) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:121) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34) 
    at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:123) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:121) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:53) 
    at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:86) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:459) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:675) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382) 
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192) 

Antwort

2

Sie brauchen nichts zu spotten. Togglz wird mit einem speziellen Modul zum Testen von Funktionsmerkmalen geliefert. Werfen Sie einen Blick hier:

http://www.togglz.org/documentation/testing.html

Es gibt zum Beispiel eine JUnit Regel, die eine einfache Möglichkeit bietet Funktionen wechseln:

public class SomeJunitTest { 

    @Rule 
    public TogglzRule togglzRule = TogglzRule.allEnabled(MyFeatures.class); 

    @Test 
    public void testToggleFeature() { 

    // all features are active by default 
    assertTrue(MyFeatures.FEATURE_ONE.isActive()); 

    // you can easily modify the feature state using the TogglzRule 
    togglzRule.disable(MyFeatures.FEATURE_ONE); 
    assertFalse(MyFeatures.FEATURE_ONE.isActive()); 

    } 

} 
+0

Nizza. Danke vielmals. – dunfa