2017-05-01 4 views
0

Abfrage Ich frage eine Geomesa-Funktion, die join Index für zwei Attribute enthält (r und di). Die Abfrage r=<int-value> läuft und gibt Daten für den angegebenen Wert r zurück, falls vorhanden. Die Abfrage di=<int-value> findet jedoch keine übereinstimmenden Datensätze, obwohl Datensätze für das gleiche vorhanden sind!Kann nicht mit zwei Attributindizes in Geomesa Feature-Typ

Hier ist meine Funktion Schema:

r:Long:cardinality=high:index=join,*g:Point:srid=4326,di:Integer:index=join,al:Float,s:Float,b:Float,an:Float,he:Float,ve:Float,t:Float,m:Boolean,i:Boolean,ts:Long;geomesa.table.sharing='true',geomesa.indices='attr:4:3,records:2:3,z2:3:3',geomesa.table.sharing.prefix='\\u0001'

ich nicht in der Lage bin, die Ursache herauszufinden. Kann ich nicht mehr als einen Attributindex in einem Schema haben?

UPDATE 1

Anbringen Query Plan

[2017-05-01 18:51:53,219] TRACE Explainer: Planning 'aj_dev' di = 1 
239099 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Planning 'aj_dev' di = 1 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,220] TRACE Explainer: Original filter: di = 1 
239100 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Original filter: di = 1 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,220] TRACE Explainer: Hints: density[false] bin[false] stats[false] map-aggregate[false] sampling[none] 
239100 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Hints: density[false] bin[false] stats[false] map-aggregate[false] sampling[none] 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,221] TRACE Explainer: Sort: none 
239101 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Sort: none 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,221] TRACE Explainer: Transforms: None 
239101 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Transforms: None 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,221] TRACE Explainer: Strategy selection: 
239101 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Strategy selection: 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,226] TRACE Explainer:  Query processing took 3ms and produced 1 options 
239106 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Query processing took 3ms and produced 1 options 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,226] TRACE Explainer:  Filter plan: FilterPlan[AttributeIndex[di = 1][None]] 
239106 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Filter plan: FilterPlan[AttributeIndex[di = 1][None]] 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,226] TRACE Explainer:  Strategy selection took 0ms for 1 options 
239106 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Strategy selection took 0ms for 1 options 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,226] TRACE Explainer: Strategy 1 of 1: AttributeIndex 
239106 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Strategy 1 of 1: AttributeIndex 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,226] TRACE Explainer:  Strategy filter: AttributeIndex[di = 1][None] 
239106 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Strategy filter: AttributeIndex[di = 1][None] 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,227] TRACE Explainer:  Plan: org.locationtech.geomesa.accumulo.index.EmptyPlan 
239107 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Plan: org.locationtech.geomesa.accumulo.index.EmptyPlan 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,227] TRACE Explainer:  Table: 
239107 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Table: 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,227] TRACE Explainer:  Deduplicate: false 
239107 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Deduplicate: false 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,227] TRACE Explainer:  Column Families: all 
239107 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Column Families: all 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,228] TRACE Explainer:  Ranges (0): 
239108 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Ranges (0): 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,228] TRACE Explainer:  Iterators (0): 
239108 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Iterators (0): 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,228] TRACE Explainer:  Plan creation took 1ms 
239108 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer -  Plan creation took 1ms 
[2017-05-01 18:51:53,228] TRACE Explainer: Query planning took 17ms 
239108 [Thread-5] TRACE org.locationtech.geomesa.index.utils.Explainer - Query planning took 17ms 

Antwort

0

Ich löste dies, indem fehlende Transformatoren in Maven Schatten Plugin wie verschiedene Laufzeitimplementierung wählen unter

<plugin> 
    <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> 
    <artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId> 
    <version>3.0.0</version> 
    <executions> 
     <execution> 
     <phase>package</phase> 
     <goals> 
      <goal>shade</goal> 
     </goals> 
     <configuration> 
      <!-- <minimizeJar>true</minimizeJar> --> 
      <createDependencyReducedPom>false</createDependencyReducedPom> 
      <filters> 
       <filter> 
        <artifact>*:*</artifact> 
        <excludes> 
        <exclude>META-INF/*.SF</exclude> 
        <exclude>META-INF/*.DSA</exclude> 
        <exclude>META-INF/*.RSA</exclude> 
        </excludes> 
       </filter> 
      </filters> 
      <transformers> 
       <transformer implementation="org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ServicesResourceTransformer" /> 
      </transformers> 
     </configuration> 
     </execution> 
    </executions> 
</plugin> 
Verwandte Themen